TPC_2019 T1044-2018 T1044-2018-Runs EIC_FNAL T1439 PWO-FNAL MVTX
  The MVTX Beam Test logbook (2019)  ELOG logo
ID Date Author Subject
  118   Sat Jun 22 15:07:36 2019 Zongze, Ming2nd TB data transfered to RCF

done.

  117   Sat Jun 22 14:02:28 2019 Zongze, MingVCLIP scan at Pulse_Dealy = 200 (5uS)

RU1 = default;

stretched setting for RU2:

IBIAS = 44

ITHR = 21

Pulse_Delay = 200 (5.0uS)

Trigger dealy  =  2.0 + 5.0 = 7uS

Beam intensity = 100K per spill for run 1245, 1246;

asked CAD to increase intensity to ~450K per spill from run 1247

Run #      VCLIP       nhit_C105 (RU2)     nhit_E103(RU1)    relative_eff (C105/E103)

1245          0                 3.4                           0.6                             5.7

1246          20                2.9                           0.9                             3.2

1247          40                 4.7                           1.3                             3.6

1248          60                 4.5                           1.4                             3.2

1249          80                 5.1                           1.4                             3.6

1250         100                 5.6                           1.4                             4.0

Attachment 1: Run1250-last-run-06222019-IMG_2535.jpg
Run1250-last-run-06222019-IMG_2535.jpg
  116   Sat Jun 22 13:57:40 2019 Zongze, Mingall back to normal setting Run #1244, lasty short reference run

250K, default settings after the long run, 53M, 13hr.

  115   Sat Jun 22 00:30:47 2019 Zongze, Minglong default run , #1243

a long reference run for default settings: --- a system stress test.

Pulse_Delay = 20 (0.5uS)

Beam trigger delay = 2.0uS

ITHR = 50 etc.

Started at 12:30AM, expect to run for 12hr, till noon on Saturday 6/22.

 

Stopped at 2PM, 53M triggers.

 

Attachment 1: RUn1243-53M-IMG_2529.jpg
RUn1243-53M-IMG_2529.jpg
Attachment 2: run1243_53M_IMG_2530.jpg
run1243_53M_IMG_2530.jpg
  114   Fri Jun 21 23:51:40 2019 Zongze, Mingall back to normal setting Run # 1242

a short reference run for default settings:

Pulse_Delay = 20 (0.5uS)

Beam trigger delay = 2.0uS

ITHR = 50 etc.

240K triggers. 

 

 

  113   Fri Jun 21 23:16:02 2019 Zongze, MingVCLIP scan at Pulse_Dealy = 280 (7uS)

RU1 = default;

stretched setting for RU2:

IBIAS = 44

ITHR = 21

Pulse_Delay = 280 (7.0uS)

Trigger dealy  =  2.0 + 7.0 = 9uS

 

Run #      VCLIP       nhit_C105 (RU2)     nhit_C104(RU1)    relative_eff (C105/C104)

1236          0                  4.9                           1.5                            3.3.

1237         20                 2.5                           0.8                            3.1

1238          40 (00?)                 2.9                           0.9                            3.2

1239          00                 2.9                           1.1                             2.8

1240          80                 7.5                           1.5                             5.0

1241          40                 3.1                           1.1                             .3.0

  112   Fri Jun 21 22:38:35 2019 Zongze, MingVCLIP scan at Pulse_Dealy = 200 (5uS)

RU1 = default;

stretched setting for RU2:

IBIAS = 44

ITHR = 21

Pulse_Delay = 200 (5.0uS)

Trigger dealy  =  2.0 + 5.0 = 7uS

 

Run #      VCLIP       nhit_C105 (RU2)     nhit_C104(RU1)    relative_eff (C105/C104)

1230          0                 2.9                           1.0                            2.9 .

1231          20                 5.1                           1.1                             4.6

1232          40                 3.4                           1.0                             3.4

1233          60                 5.8                           1.5                             3.8

1234          80                 3.6                           0.8                             0.

1225         100                 3.7                           0.8                             0

  111   Fri Jun 21 21:47:13 2019 Zongze, MingVCLIP scan at Pulse_Dealy = 160 (4uS)

RU1 = default;

stretched setting for RU2:

IBIAS = 44

ITHR = 21

Pulse_Delay = 160 (4.0uS)

Trigger dealy  =  2.0 + 4.0 = 6uS

 

Run #      VCLIP       nhit_C105 (RU2)     nhit_C104(RU1)    relative_eff (C105/C104)

1224          0                 2.8                           0.8                             3.5

1225          20               2.9                           0.9                             3.2

1226          40                 3.0                         1.0                             3.0

1227          60                 3.7                         1.0                             3.7

1228          80                 3.4                         0.8                              4.3.

1229          100               5.6                         1.2                             4.7

  110   Fri Jun 21 20:58:22 2019 Zongze, Mingstretched setting - 5uS trigger delay Run # 1217 -

RU1 = default;

stretched setting for RU2:

IBIAS = 44

ITHR = 21

Pulse_Delay = 120 (3.0uS)

Trigger dealy  =  2.0 + 3.0 = 5uS

 

Run #      VCLIP       nhit_C105 (RU2)     nhit_C104(RU1)    relative_eff (C105/C104)

1218          0                 2.7                           0.7                             0.

1219          20                 3.9                           1.0                             3.9

1220          40                 3.2                           0.9                             3.6

1221          60                 3.3                           0.9                             3.7

1217          80                 3.5                           0.8                             4.3

1217          100                3.6                           0.8                             4.5

  109   Fri Jun 21 20:17:43 2019 Zongze, MingVCLIP scan at Pulse_Dealy = 0

default settings:

IBIAS = 64

ITHR =  50

 

for RU2:

Pulse_Delay = 0 (0uS)

Trigger dealy  =  2.0 + 0 = 2uS

 

Run #      VCLIP       nhit_C105 (RU2)     nhit_C104(RU1)    relative_eff (C105/C104)

1211              0                    0.52                       0.67                 0.78

1212             20                   0.52                     0.67               

1213             40                   0.52                      0.67
1214             60                   0.52                    0.67                    0.78

1215              80                  0.88                      0.66                  1.33

1216              100                0.88                      0.67                  1.33

  108   Fri Jun 21 19:37:20 2019 ZongzeVCLIP scan at Pulse_Dealy = 120

Pulse_Delay = 120 (3.0uS)

Trigger dealy  =  2.0 + 3.0 = 5uS

 

Run #      VCLIP       nhit_C105 (RU2)     nhit_C104(RU1)    relative_eff (C105/C104)

1205              0                    0.2                       0.80                

1206             20                   0.48                     0.7                

1207             40                   0.62                      0.75
1208             60                   0.64                    0.74

1209              80                  1.1                      0.65

1210              100                1.1                      0.7

 

  107   Fri Jun 21 18:51:29 2019 Zongze, MingVCLIP scan at Pulse_Dealy = 200

Pulse_Delay = 200 (5.0uS)

Trigger dealy  =  2.0 + 5.0 = 7uS

 

Run #      VCLIP       nhit_C105 (RU2)     nhit_C104(RU1)    relative_eff (C105/C104)

1198              0                    0.2                       0.74                 27%

1199             20                   0.2                      0.82                 

1200             40                   0.2                      0.7
1201             60                   0.35                    0.7

1202              80                  1                         0.7

1203              100                 1.2                     0.7

1204             20                   0.15                      0.7

 

  106   Fri Jun 21 17:00:24 2019 Zongze, MingRU2 VCLIP= 0, deafult settings, delay scan , Run # 1

VCLIP = 0

Beam trigger delay = 2.0uS, for all, the following addtional delay relative to the beam hit = (2.0 + XX ) uS;

Framduring = 80 x 25nS = 2 uS

Beam intensity =  50K per spill

For RU2 (stave C105)

Run #       PulseDelay (RU2)                     Evts               Eff

1181         20 (20x 25nS =500 nS )           200K               ==100% as a reference point  (1.6 hits/chip)

1182          20                               224K               100%                       

1183         80 (2.0 uS)                              200K                100%

1184         120 (3.0uS)                             200K                100%

1185          160 (4.0uS)                             200K                 100%    

----   all above are actually run with pulse deay = default (20) , python script was NOT properly updated after previous FELIX firmware test ---

---- potential issues with RU2 setting in the following data sets  ----

                                                                                              average pixels/trigger   (beam rpofile seems not stable )

1186          300 (7.5uS)                             200K                  

1187          20 (0.5 uS)                              200K                    

1188          20 (0.5uS, default)                   200K                   

1189          40 (1.0 uS)                              200K                    

1190          80 (2.0 uS)                              200K                    

1191          300 (7.5 uS)                             200K                    

1193          200 (5 uS)                                200K                     

1194        20 (0,5 uS)                                 200K                     

1196        300 (7,5 uS)                               200K              

1197        500 (12.5 uS)                             200K           0 hit/stave C105     

  105   Fri Jun 21 16:52:39 2019 Shosystem back to defaults

Starting with run 1179, the system is running with the previous FELIX firmware, default testbench files, and the masklist that was used in the previous set of tests.

  104   Fri Jun 21 16:24:23 2019 Sho, Zongze, Alextest "plan B" bitstream

restore default testbench_base.py files

masklists are still empty

run 1171: 0x190 (10 us) delay, zero veto

1173: mask run with 0 delay

1174: pixels masked, 0 delay, 0 veto

1175: 0x190 delay

1176: 0x320 (20 us)

1177: 0x640 (40 us)

  103   Fri Jun 21 12:49:20 2019 Ming Liu4-satve telecope mapping

Beam coming from the bottom, hits A105 stave first.

C105 is the one connected to RU2

Attachment 1: MVTX-4-stave-Telescope-Mapping.png
MVTX-4-stave-Telescope-Mapping.png
  102   Fri Jun 21 12:25:18 2019 Zongze, Mingdata transfered to RCF

new MVTX TB data being transfered to RCF,  under "calib"

/gpfs/mnt/gpfs02/sphenix/data/data01/mvtx/tb-1441-052019/calib/

 

Will have access this afternoon at 2PM. can't program the RU baords, need to check the USB cables.

 

  101   Thu Jun 20 23:37:26 2019 Zongze, Gerd, Mingstretched setting - ITHR2 50, Run # 1141 -

beam trigger delay = 2uS;

ITHR1 = 50/defaultg

Strobe_delay to pulse  == 20;/default

IBIAS = 44 (streched setting)

VRESTD =147

VCASN = 50

VCASP = 86

VCLIP =0

VCASN2 = 57

IDB = 29

ITHR1 = 50

---  typical INTENSITY = 30K PROTONS PER 4-SEC SPILL ----

ITHR2/RU2    Run #     # of evts   

50                  1141        200K,  hit_eff == 100%

60                  1142        200K, hit_eff ~90%

70                  1143        200K,  hit_eff ~80%

80                  1144        200K, hit_eff ~ 80%

90                   1145        200K, hit_eff ~70%

100                 1146         200K        . hit_eff ~70%

120                  1147        200K, hir_eff ~ 50%

150                  1148        63K,  hit_eff ~40%

150                   1150       210K hit_eff ~40%

180                  1151        210K, hit_eff~30%

 200                  1152        240 K, Hit_eff~25%

40                      1153       218 K, hit_eff~120%

30                      1154       232K, hit_eff~205%

20                       1155      233K, hit_eff~400%

10                       1156       235K There is error on pixels

15                       1157       229K, hit_eff~750%

18                       1158      237K, hit_elf~500%

25                       1159     232K, hit_eff~300%

 

 

      

  100   Thu Jun 20 20:39:24 2019 Zongze, Gerd, MingRU2 ITHR= 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 120, Run # 1121 - #1140

beam trigger delay = 2uS;

ITHR1 = 50/defaultg

Strobe_delay to pulse  == 20;/default

IBIAS = 64

VRESTD =147

VCASN = 50

VCASP = 86

VCLIP =0

VCASN2 = 57

IDB = 29

ITHR1 = 50

---  typical INTENSITY = 30K PROTONS PER 4-SEC SPILL ----

ITHR2/RU2    Run #     # of evts    

60                  1121        300K 

50                  1122        115K

50                   1123        275K

50                   1124         200K      (cleared pixel masks, for the rest of runs below)

60                   1125         200K 

70                   1126         200K                           

80                    1127        200K

90                    1128        200K

100                  1129         200K 

120                  1130         200K

40                    1131         33K

40                    1132        200K      

30                    1133         114K

30                     1134         200K

20                     1135         200K

10                     1136         200K , note - 20% fifo_gpio_full_error

150                   1137         200K,   hit_eff ~30%

 

180                   1138,       200K,   hit_eff ~15%

135                   1139        200K, hit_eff ~35%

15                      1140      200K,  No fifo-full errors

 

 

  99   Thu Jun 20 20:37:45 2019 Zongze, MingRU2 delay = 400 x 25ns = 10us, run # 1120, long run, 2.9M triggers

long run , 2.9M triggeres

  98   Thu Jun 20 17:54:06 2019 Zongze, MingRU2 delay = 800, 20uS, run 1118

RU2, delay =800,

almost no hits in RU2 stave;

Attachment 1: RU2_delay-800-IMG_2490.jpg
RU2_delay-800-IMG_2490.jpg
  97   Thu Jun 20 17:47:28 2019 Zongze, MingRU2 delay = 400 x 25ns = 10us, run # 1117

set RU2 - delay = 400 (= 400 x 25ns = 10uS)

significant reduction seen for RU2 stave;

 

The software control is working! Nice job Sho!

Attachment 1: RU2-delay-400-IMG_2489.jpg
RU2-delay-400-IMG_2489.jpg
  96   Thu Jun 20 17:46:15 2019 Zongze, Mingback to normal ITHR2 = 50, run 1115

back to normal distributions

ithr1 = ithr2 = 50

Attachment 1: ITHR2-50-IMG_2487.jpg
ITHR2-50-IMG_2487.jpg
  95   Thu Jun 20 17:22:25 2019 Zongze, MingITHR2 = 250, run 1114

ITHR1 = 50;

ITHR2 = 250

Attachment 1: ITHR2-250-IMG_2486.jpg
ITHR2-250-IMG_2486.jpg
  94   Thu Jun 20 17:21:05 2019 Zongze, MingITHR2= 150, Run # 1113

ITHR1= 50;

ITHR2 = 150

Attachment 1: ITHR2-150-IMG_2485.jpg
ITHR2-150-IMG_2485.jpg
  93   Thu Jun 20 17:12:33 2019 Zongze, MingITHR2_150, run #1112

ITHR1=50;

ITHR2 = 100

Attachment 1: ITHR2-100-IMG_2481.jpg
ITHR2-100-IMG_2481.jpg
  92   Thu Jun 20 16:55:12 2019 Zongze, Mingtestbench_base1,2 - test run 1111

all default values for testbench1 and testbench2.

ITHR = 50, default value;

 

Attachment 1: ITHR50_IMG_2480.jpg
ITHR50_IMG_2480.jpg
  91   Thu Jun 20 16:52:57 2019 Zongze, Ming120 GeV p beam with mask - Run # 1110

120 GeV proton beam data with noisy pixels masked.

Attachment 1: proton-120-with-mask-IMG_2479.jpg
proton-120-with-mask-IMG_2479.jpg
  90   Thu Jun 20 01:23:28 2019 Zongze, Gerd, Ming120 GeV p beam

clearn beam profile, may need to move the dedetctor up a bit ~0.5cm to be on the center of the beam..

Attachment 1: 120_p_IMG_2473.jpg
120_p_IMG_2473.jpg
  89   Thu Jun 20 00:32:54 2019 Zongze, Gerd, Mingfirst beam for the 2nd MVTX TB

parasitic with TPC, INTT ... clear hits seen in MVTX sensors;

16Gev e- beam (some mix of pion-)

Attachment 1: IMG_2471.jpg
IMG_2471.jpg
Attachment 2: IMG_2470.jpg
IMG_2470.jpg
  88   Sat May 25 01:38:33 2019 Matt & Mingbeam status

MCR called, saying the situation is challenging and may take several hours to fix. given this is the last a few hours of scheduled beamtime, and the long weekend, we decide to end the TB for MVTX.

Launched data transfer to RCF.

  87   Sat May 25 01:31:11 2019 Matt & MingRFQ anode trip, no estimate for beam

it is 1:30AM and MCR is not sure about the beam schedule;

we will wait till 2AM, if still no new, we will end our TB.

  86   Sat May 25 00:46:11 2019 Matt & Ming 5GeV e- Run 1040-xx

5GeV beam,

Run 1040: 1,205,852 event;

Run 1041: 81,805;

MCR lost beam.

 

  85   Fri May 24 23:49:41 2019 Xuan & CameronNew data with 5 GeV electron beam

Following the previous sets and start to take low energy electron beam tests.

Beam energy 5 GeV.

Beam intensity at 47k ppp.

Run 1039 calibration run.

  84   Fri May 24 23:41:00 2019 Cameron, Xuan, Xiaochun, Zongze, Mingwhat's going to happen with 5GeV e-?

we asked for 5GeV e- beam to scan MVTX stave material. It was shown for 5GeV e-, one expect 75% e- and 25% pi-.

  83   Fri May 24 23:36:43 2019 Xuan & CameronRequested to start the low energy electron beams

Contacted teh MCR to start the 5 GeV electron beam.

Beam componets: ~ 75% electrons and ~ 25% pi-.

  82   Fri May 24 23:03:30 2019 Xuan & Cameron & XiaochunPhysics runs at 120 GeV proton beam

Beam energy 120 GeV proton.

Beam intensity 50k ppp.

Run1038 with trigger delay 2 mu s, default setting.

1M events achieved.

 

  81   Fri May 24 22:55:46 2019 Xuan & Cameron & XiaochunShift the telescope box back to center the beam location within the first stave

Move the beam location back to 278 mm horizontally and 1078 mm vertically. The beam profile get narrowed.

Start to take physics runs to accumulate 1M events.

  80   Fri May 24 22:45:53 2019 Xuan Li & Cameron & XiaochunRequest to narrow the beam profile

The beam profile is wide spread along two chips, requested to narrow the beam profile.

Another suspect is in the day time the CMS group is testing their calorimetry system. The calorimeter system might be in front of us, which will spread the tracks from the beam as well.

Another suspect is the supporting frames are Al bars on the edge of the staves. When tilting the telescope box, the beam could hit the supporting frames and generate multiple scattering.

  79   Fri May 24 22:21:11 2019 Xuan & CameronShifting the staves with 120 GeV proton beam

Run 1036 beam location 299.9 mm vertically and 1062.7 mm horizontally.

Run 1037 is a tuning run, starting with beam location 299.9mm vertically and 1077.7 mm horizontally, later the beam location moves to 315.0 mm vertically and 1077.7 mm horizontally, then the beam location moves to 324.7 mm vertically and 1077.7 mm horizontally.

 

  78   Fri May 24 22:08:44 2019 CameronBeam on titlted table

We have placed a wedge under the side of the telescope furthest from the beam with a thickness of ~1.5cm
Will take data under nominal settings with 50k pps and a beam size of 0.5cm
Run 1036 - First run. Can see tilt in deltaRow

  77   Fri May 24 21:43:47 2019 Xuan & CameronTrigger rate strentch tests

Using Nominal Frame Duration (2us)
Run 1026 under 10 kHZ trigger rate without beam. 1M events no errors.

Run 1027 under  50kHZ trigger rate without beam. 47k overflows from RU2 out of 1M events.

Run 1028 under 50 kHZ trigger rate without beam. 17k overflows from RU1 and 47k overflows fron  RU2 out of 1M events. 2 events lost.
Run 1029 under 100 kHZ trigger rate without beam. 39k overflows from RU1 and 15k overflows from RU2 out of 1M events. 9 events lost.

Run 1030 under 200 kHZ trigger rate without beam. 65k overflows from RU1 and 9.6k overflows from RU2 out of 1M events. 2 events lost.

Run 1031 under 500 kHZ trigger rate without beam. 13k overflows from RU1 and 55k overflows from RU2 out of 1M events. 3 events lost. 500kHz is a pulse every 2us. Probably have to change pulse length to 100ns again

Run 1032 under 1MHz trigger rate without beam. 32k overflows from RU1 and 6k overflows from RU2 out of 1M events. 2 events lost.

Changed Frame Duration to 100ns

Run 1033 under 500 kHZ trigger rate without beam. 31k overflows from RU1 and 35k overflows from RU2 out of 1M events. 9 events lost.

Run 1034 under 1MHz trigger rate without beam. 54k overflows from RU1 and 600 overflows from RU2 out of 1M events. 4 events lost.

Reverting settings back to default

 

 

  76   Fri May 24 21:28:36 2019 Xiaochu & MingTelescope box offset, dY = 1.5cm

Raised the backend of the telescope by 1.5cm;

slope = 1.5cm /12" = 0.05

Desired slope = 2mm / 4cm = 0.05

For material busget scanning with 5GeV e- beam later in the evening

  75   Fri May 24 19:00:30 2019 Xuan LiEvening shift starts and the beam profile is wide

Evening shift starts. The beam profile is wide and beam intensity is high. Need to tune the beam before take data.

  74   Fri May 24 07:08:40 2019 Mingupload data launched

started data transfer

  72   Fri May 24 06:03:37 2019 Ming Liuextended run 1022

try to keep the current run 1022 as long as possible,

50k pps; ~ 10kHz trigger

started 5AM.

  71   Fri May 24 04:55:52 2019 Cameron

Run 1022 - Frame length reverted to normal and taking 50k protons/spill again,
 

  70   Fri May 24 03:12:07 2019 Cameron

Run 1015 - 100k protons/spill
Run 1016 - 200k protons/spill
Run 1017 - 400k protons/spill - Lost 2 events in 1055964 triggers
Run 1018 - 400k protons/spill - Lost 6 events in 1064299 triggers
Run 1019 - 800k protons/spill - Fifo overflow in RU1 was 56273, overflow in RU2 was 24107. Lost 39 events in 1042583 triggers
Run 1020 - 1.2M protons/spill - Maxed out Fermilab, Fifo overflow in RU1 was 55914, overflow in RU2 was 24469. Lost 110 events in 1025883 triggers
Run 1021 - 1.2M protons/spill, frame change to 100ns. Fifo overflow in RU1 was 57351, overflow in RU2 was 50498. Lost 124 events in 1038680 triggers

  69   Fri May 24 02:51:10 2019 zongze Run 1014

Reference for high data rate 50K per spill.

  68   Thu May 23 23:37:27 2019 Xuan Li & Cameron & XiaochunRun 1010 after remove the Pb bricks

Run 1010 is to check the stave performance after removed the Pb bricks.

Same configuration as run 1009.

  67   Thu May 23 23:36:36 2019 Xuan & Cameron & XiaochunRemoved the Pb bricks

We accessed the experimental hall to remove Pb bricks.

  66   Thu May 23 23:13:25 2019 Xuan Li & Cameron & XiaochunNew runs with Pb bricks in front of the staves

Run 1009  with the 8 inch Pb bricks in front of the staves. which is 9 feet and 8 inches apart.

Using the default configuration as in run1008 and trigger delay 2 mu s.

 

Attachment 1: Pb_Block_Run1009_StartOfRun.pdf
Pb_Block_Run1009_StartOfRun.pdf
  65   Thu May 23 22:50:23 2019 Xuan Li & CameronBring the Pb target back

We access the experimental hall to bring back the Pb target.

Run 1009 - Pb Block in beam path. 8 inch thick and 9 ft 8 inch from start of lead block to start of telescope box

  64   Thu May 23 22:30:42 2019 Xuan Lirun 1008 with wide beam profile

The beam profile is much wider than before. horizontal width 0.5 cm and vertical width around 1.5 cm.

Run 1008 is a long run under this beam condition. The configure is the same as last night's shift. Trigger delay 2 mu s.

This is a reference run to compare with previous data.

average beam intensity 3.9 E09 ppp.

  63   Thu May 23 21:24:51 2019 CameronTargets

Run 1004 - Aluminum target on chip 4
Run 1005 - No target on chip 4 (reference)
 

Thickness of lead required to stop 120 GeV protons is

  62   Thu May 23 18:52:40 2019 Xuan LiEvening shift starts

We have beam in.

  61   Thu May 23 03:36:45 2019 ming liuhigh rate 100k pps

asked MCR to deliver 10x higher luminosity for 80-20 imaging .

Now intensity ~ 100K pps, Run # 1000

  60   Thu May 23 03:21:51 2019 matt durham80/20 target

1.5"x1.5" cross section

Quote:

Hubert and Xiaochun put in a piece of 80/20 100 inches in front of the MAPS sensors.  Run 1000

 

  59   Thu May 23 03:21:02 2019 ming liuReference run 999 hit distribution

Run 999, reference system,

Signam_red (C105, the long cable) = 0.55 (pixle)

 

Run 1000, with Al 80-20 frame,

Sigma_red = 0.82 (pixel)

  58   Thu May 23 03:18:25 2019 matt durham80/20 target

Hubert and Xiaochun put in a piece of 80/20 100 inches in front of the MAPS sensors.  Run 1000

  57   Thu May 23 00:00:57 2019 gjklow intensity run

center chip run 999 with 12,000 pps

  56   Wed May 22 22:55:09 2019 gjkhigh intensity center chip study

run - 998 - 275.9 1094.4 with 80,000 pps

  55   Wed May 22 20:42:07 2019 gjk cdnew pixel mask and scan all centers and borders

 

run a new pixel mask with no beam, masked out 200 (zero threshold) which is less than before.

moved table to 972, all staves work.

asked for 50,000 pps

new beam hight 275

rightmost position

chip 8        - 977 - 275.8 972.6

middle 7/8 - 978 - 275.8 987.6

chip 7        - 979 - 275.8 1002.6

middle 6/7 - 980 - 275.8 1017.6

chip 6         - 981 - 275.9 1032.6

middle 5/6  - 982 - 275.9 1047.6

chip 5          - 983 - 275.9 1062.6

middle         - 984 - 275.9 1077.6

chip 4           - 985 - 275.9 1094.4     long because wire target is in place

middle          - 986 - 275.9 1108.6

chip 3           - 989  - 275.9 1123.6

middle          - 990  - 275.9 1138.6

chip 2           - 991  - 275.9 1154.6

middle          - 992   - 275.9 1169.4

chip 1            - 993   - 275.9 1184.4

middle           - 994   - 275.9 1200.4

chip 0             - 995   - 275.9 1215.4

edge               - 996   - 275.9 1230.4              

 

 

  54   Wed May 22 20:40:44 2019 gjk cdfound box in the atlas beam with 600,000 pps

 

power unit and readout unit were turned off.

  53   Wed May 22 06:50:31 2019 Hubertrun with target wire

run 968 has a ~300 um lead solder wire on the vertical laser line

  52   Wed May 22 06:10:42 2019 Hubert, Matt, Xiaochun, Ming11.4m SamTec cable works!

We are now taking data with the long 8.8m cable received today + 2.6m short one. total length = 11.4m.

Run # 967, trigger rate ~10kHz (58k ppp);

The long cable (red plot) seems working as good as others!

Pixel hits/trigger:

1/stave = 2.41

2/ = 2.75

3/ = 3.25

4/ = 2.50

Attachment 1: SamTec-2.6m-8.8m-IMG_2137.jpg
SamTec-2.6m-8.8m-IMG_2137.jpg
  51   Wed May 22 05:28:08 2019 matt durhamdata with 11.5m cable on RU2

switched cables on RU2.  Same setup as previous long run 958 for comparison.

 

Take run 967

  50   Wed May 22 03:51:35 2019 Ming Liunew reference run with defaiult 8m cable

plot for print

Attachment 1: Image-5.png
Image-5.png
  49   Wed May 22 03:34:32 2019 Ming LiuMVTX Firmware and Software GitLab

https://gitlab.cern.ch/sphenix-mvtx

one needs CERN account to access the MVTX readout firmware and software.

  48   Wed May 22 03:16:55 2019 Hubert, MIngSamTec custom cable mapping

Hubert and I checked and marked  the new SamTec mapping;

Chan-1 and Chan-2;

The current readout configuration for RU2:

Chan-1 cabels are connected to the stave C104 and RU2.  (2.6m + 5.3m)

New cables: 1.2m + 8.8m;

 

 

Attachment 1: IMG_2124.jpg
IMG_2124.jpg
Attachment 2: IMG_2125.jpg
IMG_2125.jpg
  47   Wed May 22 02:59:13 2019 matt durhamdata back with working pixel mask

Run 958, beam data is back to normal.

  46   Wed May 22 02:58:41 2019 Ming Liunew reference run with defaiult 8m cable

Run # 958, reference run for SamTec cable test:

Intensity:  ~55K pps, eq ~10kHz

Nominal position: low background with new pixel mask;

AVG # of pixle hits per trigger:

staves:

1/E102, chip 4 (central one) = 2.55

2/C105, chip4 = 2.86

3/C104, chip4 = 3.28. (custom 8m cable)

4/A105, chip4 = 2.53

 

 

 

Attachment 1: Run958-Ref-8mcable-Image-4.png
Run958-Ref-8mcable-Image-4.png
  45   Wed May 22 02:40:48 2019 matt durhamanother try at new pixel mask

Run 957.  Now mask_pixels(0) gives us 372, a little more reasonable.  I think 3 staves were out of the data stream last time but are back now.  We will use this mask.

  44   Wed May 22 02:08:21 2019 matt durhamdata w new pixel mask

start run 951, only one stave has data.  Pwer cycle RU and staves

Run 952: still out

Restart DAQ.  sync triggers on 954 then take beam data on 955.  Everything back.

  43   Wed May 22 01:45:44 2019 matt durhamnew pixel mask

making new pixel mask.  Beam off, triggering on pulser, mask removed.  Run 949. with setting of mask_pixels(0) got ~440 pixels masked.

Try again after power cycling RU and ALPIDES.  Run 950. Got 134 masked.  Push to Nuc and use this.

  42   Wed May 22 00:49:58 2019 gjk cdcontinues readout test

run 942 triggered by 125 khz pulser

 

we should gate the pulser with begin and end spill

 

 

  41   Wed May 22 00:34:29 2019 gjkfilling in points in the graph

Run 939, with ITHR=21, IBIAS=44, IDB=29. Trigger delay = 8.5 us. w/ 5.3 m cable

 

  40   Tue May 21 22:50:09 2019 Xuan Li -gjkNew physics runs with new DAC values to extend shaping time

Run 923, with ITHR=21, IBIAS=44, IDB=29. Trigger delay = 1 us. w/ 5.3 m cable.

Run 924, with ITHR=21, IBIAS=44, IDB=29. Trigger delay = 2 us w/ 5.3 m cable.

Run 925, with ITHR=21, IBIAS=44, IDB=29. Trigger delay = 4 us w/ 5.3 m cable.

Run 938, with ITHR=21, IBIAS=44, IDB=29. Trigger delay = 10 us w/ 5.3 m cable.

Run 927, with ITHR=21, IBIAS=44, IDB=29. Trigger delay = 11 us w/ 5.3 m cable

Run 928, with ITHR=21, IBIAS=44, IDB=29. Trigger delay = 12 us w/ 5.3 m cable.

Run 929, with ITHR=21, IBIAS=44, IDB=29. Trigger delay = 13 us w/ 5.3 m cable.

Run 930, with ITHR=21, IBIAS=44, IDB=29. Trigger delay = 9 us w/ 5.3 m cable.

Run 931, with ITHR=21, IBIAS=44, IDB=29. Trigger delay = 8 us w/ 5.3 m cable.
 
Run 932, with ITHR=21, IBIAS=44, IDB=29. Trigger delay = 7.5 us w/ 5.3 m cable.

Run 933, with ITHR=21, IBIAS=44, IDB=29. Trigger delay = 7.0 us w/ 5.3 m cable.

Run 934, with ITHR=21, IBIAS=44, IDB=29. Trigger delay = 6.5 us w/ 5.3 m cable.

Run 935, with ITHR=21, IBIAS=44, IDB=29. Trigger delay = 6.0 us w/ 5.3 m cable.

 

 

 

  39   Tue May 21 22:18:49 2019 Xuan LiStart the pedestal runs

Start the pedestal runs with different sets of IDB, ITHR and IBIAS to take the pixel mask maps for each individual runs.

Run 918, IBIAS: 59, IDB: 19, ITHR: 45

Run 920, IBIAS: 64, IDB: 19, ITHR: 45

Run 921, IBIAS: 44, IDB: 29, ITHR: 21

Run 922, IBIAS: 44, IDB: 29, ITHR: 21

  38   Tue May 21 22:08:40 2019 Xuan LiNew run with new ITHR and IBIAS values

Set ITHR = 21, IBIAS = 44. w/ 5.3m cable.

beam in the center of staves (5th chip) and table rotation 1 degree.

Run 915 is noisy and need pedestal w/o beam.

 

  37   Tue May 21 22:06:17 2019 CameronChanging strobe length

Altering value of IDB and ITHR to reproduce the Fig36 of the readout technique note.

  36   Tue May 21 22:03:40 2019 CameronNew 8.8m Cable Test

We were unable to get the new cable to work. We configured the readout units 4 times and got the same error when setting up RU2. Check gth is aligned gave false for chips 4 and 6.

Reverted back to older cable and everything worked again. Will check continuity of this cable and possibly use one of the others delivered by samtec in the next shift

  35   Tue May 21 19:58:35 2019 Xuan LiMay 21 evening shift data taking

Run 908, beam in the center of staves (the 5th chip). rotate the table by 1 degree, beam location 1092.5 mm.
This is a 30 min run w/ 5.3m new cable. Will change to 8.8m new cable and repeat.
NHits/Event for Stave C104 = 2.67

Changed the 5.3 m cable with 8.8m cable, did not work.

Run 912 with beam in the center of staves (the 5th chip). rotate the table by 1 degree, beam location 1092.5 mm.

This is a 30 min run w/ 5.3m new cable.

Previous runs are under ITHR=50 and IDB=29, these two parameters can be tuned to study the pulse shape of the ALIPIDE.

To change this, in line 265 and 266 in testbench_base.py.
 

 

 

 

 

  34   Tue May 21 18:45:37 2019 Ming LiuTo do's for tonight

a few things for tonight:

1. test the new ling SamTec ables;

- only replace  the 2nd half cables, keep the one connected to the stave, RU2

- take a good long reference run with the current setup (8m SamTec)

2. take high stat data

- some Millions event, no ronation

3. scan ALPIDE parameters

- threshold, shapping time etc.

4.

 

  33   Tue May 21 18:44:09 2019 Ming Liuasked reduce beam intensity to 50K per spill

ATLAS group is done for today, beam is for us.

Asked MCR to reduced the beam intensity from 1M to 50K per spill

 

  32   Tue May 21 15:12:44 2019 CameronChecking runs for out of sync staves

There is a worry that some runs could have a stave out of sync. Checking the pixel deltas to see if anything looks odd.

865 - This is fine. Beam going through excluded chip

868 - As above

871 - As above (2 chips)

877 - This is the original suspicious one for an out of sync stave (C105)

879 til 883 - Bad connections in setup

884 - Excluded chip and table was in rotation. May still be an issue though

890 - Bad connections in setup

894 - Stave C104 had half a chip hit

 

 

  31   Tue May 21 14:21:50 2019 matt durhamhigher intensity running - 25kHz

Run 898 - x=scan, y=270, phi = -40 degrees.  started at 0626 end 0640

moving in x 5mm per spill

 

turn back to phi=0

Run 899 - x=scan, y=270, phi = 0 degrees.  started at 0642 end 0715

moving in x 5mm per spill

stop at x=1175

  30   Tue May 21 06:28:20 2019 Ming Liuhigh intensity bean 25kHz

started high intensity beam , 100K ppp,

~25kHz trigger rate

  29   Tue May 21 06:26:19 2019 matt durhamhigher intensity running - 25kHz

Run 898 - x=scan, y=270, phi = -40 degrees.  started at 0626 end 0640

moving in x 5mm per spill

 

turn back to phi=0

Run 899 - x=scan, y=270, phi = 0 degrees.  started at 0642 end 0715

moving in x 5mm per spill

stop at x=1175

  28   Tue May 21 05:24:16 2019 matt durhamtranslated into live areas

realign and now all beam spots on live areas

Run 893 - x=1075, y=270, phi = -40 degrees.  started at 0523, end 0530

Run 894 - x=1045, y=270, phi = -40 degrees.  started at 0532 end 0539

Run 895 - x=1085, y=270, phi = -40 degrees.  started at 0540 end 0548

Run 896 - x scan 1165 and 1135 , y=270, phi = -40 degrees.  started at 0550 end 0559

Run 897 - x=scan, y=270, phi = -40 degrees.  started at 0600 end 0625

  27   Tue May 21 05:05:56 2019 Ming Liudisconnected LV connectors at stave end

found a disconnected LV (Digital) for the 1st stave;

had a controlled access to resit this cable and the whole system runs again.

Attachment 1: LV-connector-issues-IMG_2110.jpg
LV-connector-issues-IMG_2110.jpg
  26   Tue May 21 04:57:42 2019 matt durhamdata at -30 deg run 891

Ming, Hubert, Xiaochun fixed cables.

 

Run 891 - x=1090, y=270, phi = -30 degrees.  started at 0503 (wait a few minutes for beam to come in), end at 0512

 

Run 892 - x=1090, y=270, phi = -40 degrees.  started at 0514, end at 0521

  25   Tue May 21 04:16:09 2019 matt ddata at -10 deg run 888, -20 deg run 889

Run 888 - x=1090, y=270, phi = -10 degrees.  started at 0415, end at 0433 

Run 889 - x=1090, y=270, phi = -20 degrees.  started at 0434, end at  0442

Run 890 - x=1090, y=270, phi = -30 degrees.  started at 0443, end at

Cables came unplugged!!!  Lost the data.

 

  24   Tue May 21 03:46:45 2019 matt dback to data w run 885, but onlmon problem

Run 885 - x=1090, y=270, phi = -10 degrees.  started at 0347.  stop at 0353, online monitoring not working.

Run 886, still not working.

 

Restart DAQ, run 887 short junk run to align trigger. Run 88 start to take data

  23   Tue May 21 03:05:47 2019 matt dfixed Assertion Error in RU

Ming found a couple USB connections that were loose.  Seemed to fix the issue.  Thanks Cameron for waking up and talking us though it.

If you see dead staves check the RU currents (middle terminal on Nuc).

 

Run 884: straight on.  Doing some translation and rotation to line up chips.

 

 

  22   Tue May 21 02:19:14 2019 Ming LiuDefault PS readings

2 RUs + PU operation:

1. FAN = 12V. 2.3A

2. 4 staves: 3.3V, 3.5A;  -5V, 0.01A

3. RUs: 5.0V, 5.1A

 

Attachment 1: MVTX-PS-readings-IMG_1792.jpg
MVTX-PS-readings-IMG_1792.jpg
  21   Tue May 21 02:02:52 2019 matt durhamfixing staves

Ming and Hubert make an access to re-seat cables that may have come unplugged during rotation.

 

Run 884: junk data on pulser trigger to see if staves are reconnected

  20   Tue May 21 01:51:59 2019 hvhstaves disconnected?

after rotation from -30 to -45, staves 1,2 missing.

Rotate back to -30, staves 1,2,4 missing

Rotate to 0, staves 1,2,4 missing.

Disk full warning

  19   Tue May 21 00:40:25 2019 ming liustrobe delay scan plot

Completed strobe delay scan;

operation point:  delay = 2.0uS

 

Attachment 1: strobe_delay.pdf
strobe_delay.pdf
  18   Tue May 21 00:33:26 2019 Ming Liucontrolled access to move stop-block

we found the right most chips ("chip -8", look down stream) can't be accessed in the current motion table setting;

had a controlled access to moved the limiting block further out by ~5cm.

Hubert, Gerd, Xiaochun and Ming

  17   Mon May 20 23:39:26 2019 gjkrotation

run 873
run 874 - lost beam before events

run 875 - junk

run 877 - angular track (-30deg, x = 1079.3 up, y = 270.1)

run 878 - angular track (-30deg, x = 1060 up, y = 270.1) - stop at 0130

run 879 - angular track (-45deg, x =1060  up, y = 270.1) - start at 0131, stop at 0134: one stave had no hits, maybe came unplugged?

run 880 - angular track (-30deg, x =1060  up, y = 270.1) - start at 0135, stop at 138, 3 staves wtith no data.

run 881, back t ozero degress to see effect, three still dead

run 882 test w/pulser trigger, junk data

 

  16   Mon May 20 23:13:15 2019 gjkscan other side

remember there is a 2 mm hysteresis

run 868        1125.4 270.1 (coming from the right)

run 869         1156.1 270.1

run 870          1186.3 270.1

run  871          1216.7 270.1      

run 873           1095.9  270.1 back to center - maybe slight tilt

  15   Mon May 20 22:52:53 2019 gjkChip Scan

beam back at 22:50

2 us delay

center run 862  plus (some moving)

1st move left 1063.6 270.1 run 863

2st move left 1033.3 270.1 run 864

3rd move left 1002.4 270.1 run 865

4th move left - failed because of hard limit for horizontal.

 

  14   Mon May 20 19:34:37 2019 gjktrigger delay study

beam back - hor sigma 6 mm - vert sigma 3.5 mm - requested 40,000 counts - got them at 7:39

centered beam in the middle of the stave with down 7 mm, right 5 mm ie. 270.1 - 1095.5

sdb died - cannot mount - superblock failure - switched to external disk at 8:05

trigger delay scan:

delay 750 ns - run 848

delay 1.25 us - run 849

delay 2.25 us - run 850

delay 3.25 us - run 851

delay 4.25 us - run 852

delay 5.25 us - run 853        stave 2 = 1.7/ev

delay 5.5 us   - run 854             

delay 5.75 us - run 855        stave 2 = 0.6/ev

delay 6.00 us  - run 856       stave 2 = 0.33/ev

delay 6.25 us  - run 857       stave 2 = 0.21/ev

delay 6.50 us  - run 858       stave 2 = 0.165/ev

delay 5.00 us  - run 859      

delay 4.75 us  - run 860       stave 2 = 2.8/ev         

delay 4.50 us  - run  861   

 

 

 

 

 

  13   Mon May 20 10:40:59 2019 CameronRuns

Run 831 - First beam

Run 834 - Noise run for pixel mask. 10kHz from signal generator

  12   Mon May 20 10:01:35 2019 cameron, hubert, matt, mingstopped data taking

ATLAS asked for high intensity beam for their detector tunning;

Stopped data taking and moved the detector down by 15cm, Y0 =136mm

  11   Mon May 20 09:28:31 2019 Cameron, Huber and MIngWe got data!

first events display showingh we are getting proper tracks!

Attachment 1: first_beam_IMG_2075.jpg
first_beam_IMG_2075.jpg
  10   Mon May 20 08:43:49 2019 Cameron and Mingfirst beam after a long shutdown!

MCR is deliverinbg beam at intensity ~10K per spill ; we are moving the telescope to the normal position now;

X0 = 1085 mm;

Y0 = 278 mm; (was 130mm, 15cm below the beam)

 

For some reasons, the FELIC server restarted itself, in the process of restarting

 

Attachment 1: Screen_Shot_2019-05-20_at_9.04.15_AM.png
Screen_Shot_2019-05-20_at_9.04.15_AM.png
  9   Sat May 18 18:11:14 2019 Ming LiuDefault MVTX table locations

X = 1085 mm;

Y = 278 mm;

Phi =0;

https://www.phenix.bnl.gov/WWW/publish/mxliu/sPHENIX/LDRD/Telescope/photos/Normal-locations.jpg

  8   Sat May 18 17:24:40 2019 Ming LiuORC review response

ORC reviewed on May 16 (Thur), and approved on May 17 (Fri), 2019.

attached is our response to ORC recommendations.

Attachment 1: sPHENIX-MVTX-ORC-05162019-Responses.pdf
sPHENIX-MVTX-ORC-05162019-Responses.pdf sPHENIX-MVTX-ORC-05162019-Responses.pdf sPHENIX-MVTX-ORC-05162019-Responses.pdf sPHENIX-MVTX-ORC-05162019-Responses.pdf sPHENIX-MVTX-ORC-05162019-Responses.pdf
  7   Sat May 18 16:29:54 2019 Ming LiuMVTX Test Beam Data localtion - TB1441

all MVTX testbeam data from May 2019 are located at,

/gpfs/mnt/gpfs02/sphenix/data/data01/mvtx/tb-1441-052019

- calib

- junk

- beam

- longrun

 

  6   Sat May 18 16:02:19 2019 Ming LiuRotation angle and Chip Crossing - TB 1441

Telescope rotation angle and chip crossing distance. 

  5   Sat May 18 15:12:56 2019 Ming LiuMVTX Test Beam Data Taking Plan

Plan for telescope data taking:

Trigger: SC1 + SC2 + SC3 + Spill (F:MTSCL5)

Delay adjusted through local NIM modules (delay + TTL)

 

Day-1:  geometry mapping, trigger delay study etc.

1. 120GeV proton beam at norminal intensity, ~15kHz (= 15k x 4Sec = 60k protons), ~10M events (~10min); 

  - check relative hit distributions from online monitoring; (dX,dY)

  - adjust trigger delay to get maximum # of hits per trigger (trigger delay = 0 ~ 7uS, possible default ~ 1.5uS)

  - move the motion table +/- 30mm each time to scan all sensors

 

2. Horizontal scan for each sensor group (4 chips), offset in Y to map the physics geometry

  - check hit distributions for all sensors from online monitoring; 4 corners; map the sensor geometric location (x,y) vs (Col. Row)  

 

3. Detector alignment study

 - preliminary alignment in (X,Y)

Day-2:

1. High stat. data at several beam angles, 10, 20, 30 degrees;

Day-3:

1. some other fun stuff...

2. low energy beam? 5GeV?

 

more ...  TBD

 

  2   Sat May 18 09:53:15 2019 Ming LiuMVTX TB entry

this is a test, the telescope photo is attacehd.

Attachment 1: Telescope-system-IMG_2017.jpg
Telescope-system-IMG_2017.jpg
  1   Fri May 17 19:13:06 2019 Martintest entry

just to see if we can make entries...

ELOG V3.1.3-