“CGC” models vs. data

• Foreword: High pT at midrapidity at RHIC is above Qs ~ 1-2 GeV/c (straight application of CGC arguable in 1st instance).

• Magnitude of Au+Au suppression  saturated (evolved) Au wave function (KLM). But: no suppression expected in other calculations (e.g. Baier, Wiedemann et al.).
• Centrality dependence of Au+Au suppression  Npart scaling -like observed.
• Dissapeareance of away-side angular correlations (monojet production)
• Some deficit (RdA~ 0.75) expected in d+Au collisions (Kharzeev et al.).
• However: Cronin enhancement built in the initial wave function (Baier, Wiedemann et al.). Similar conclusions by J.Jalilian-Marian too (though no calculations y < 1), but missing in KLM.
• More converging agreement needed between diff. calculations ...
• (seem to describe either Au+Au or d+Au, but not both consistently)

Notes: