First page Back Continue Last page Overview Graphics
āCGCā models vs. data
Caveat: High pT at midrapidity at RHIC is above Qs ~ 1-2 GeV/c (straight application of CGC questionable in first instance).
-
Magnitude of Au+Au suppression ļ saturated Au wave function (Kharzeev et al.). But: no suppression expected in Baier, Wiedemann et al. calculations
- Centrality dependence of Au+Au suppression ļ Npart scaling -like observed (modulo quantitative details).
- Some deficit expected in d+Au collisions (Kharzeev et al.).
- d+Au Cronin enhancement built in the initial wave function (Baier, Wiedemann et al.). Similar conclusions by J.Jalilian too (though no calculations at y = 0), but missing in KLM.
- Somewhat confusing interpretation of Au+Au, d+Au results.
- More converging agreement needed between diff. calculations ...
- (in any case, they seem to describe either Au+Au or d+Au
- observations, but not both at once)
-
Notes: